Find relevant opportunities
Browse clinical fellowships, research positions, observerships and recurring short courses by country and orthopaedic subspecialty.
ABOUT ORTHOFELLOW
Better evidence for a life-shaping fellowship decision.
OrthoFellow is an independent global directory that turns fragmented fellowship information into structured, source-linked decision support—so surgeons can compare training, eligibility, timing, funding and application routes before continuing to the official institution.
1229current canonical profiles
60countries represented
144source-backed faculty pages
WHY IT EXISTS
A global search deserves more than scattered tabs and old PDFs.
A fellowship can shape a surgeon's clinical practice, research direction, professional network and family life. Yet the information needed to make that decision is often spread across hospital pages, society directories, PDFs and personal networks.
OrthoFellow exists to make that search more transparent and comparable. It is a research and navigation layer—not a replacement for the official programme, an employing institution, a regulator or individual professional advice.
See the practical differences
Review training exposure, funding, duration, eligibility, application details and faculty information in a consistent format.
Continue to the source
Use OrthoFellow as a structured starting point, then confirm current details with the official programme or institution.
OUR EDITORIAL METHOD
How a program earns its place.
Every listing is organised around traceable sources, canonical identities and clear evidence boundaries.
- 01Discover the canonical programme
Duplicate calls, society listings and old PDFs are grouped into one decision profile before publication.
- 02Prioritise primary sources
Current hospital, university, department, accreditor and professional-society pages outrank summaries and third-party directories.
- 03Extract decision fields separately
Eligibility, deadline, duration, funding, clinical participation and application routes each need their own evidence.
- 04Cross-check supporting evidence
Professional-society directories and current programme documents are used to confirm names, centres and recognition.
- 05Publish uncertainty
Missing, partial and conflicting details remain visibly unresolved instead of being inferred or converted into a rating.
- 06Date every review
Profiles show when sources were last checked and keep a correction route open for institutions and applicants.
Directory methodology last reviewed: 30 August 2026
EDITORIAL BOARD & GOVERNANCE
Named responsibility, visible limits.
Trust should not depend on anonymous reviewers. Editorial roles, review scope and conflicts are disclosed as the board develops.
Anissa Feby Canintika
Founder and clinical editor. Responsible for the evidence framework, corrections and publication standards.
Appointments in progress
Specialist advisers will be named only after their review scope and conflicts of interest can be published.
No anonymous ratings
OrthoFellow does not publish anonymous programme scores. Any future alumni input will require verification and structured questions.
Trust framework last reviewed: 30 August 2026
FROM THE FOUNDERFounded in Indonesia.
Founded in Indonesia.
Designed for a global profession.
OrthoFellow was founded by Anissa Feby Canintika, an orthopaedic clinician who kept encountering the same problem: excellent opportunities existed, but the information was fragmented and difficult to compare—especially for international applicants.
“I built OrthoFellow because a fellowship decision deserves more than a collection of bookmarks. Surgeons should be able to see what is documented, what remains unknown and where to verify every important detail.”
Anissa Feby Canintika · Founder, OrthoFellow
EDITORIAL INDEPENDENCE
A navigator, not a selection body.
OrthoFellow is an independent information platform. It does not accredit programmes, grant medical registration, issue visas, guarantee eligibility or influence selection decisions.
Programme details can change. Applicants should always confirm current dates, requirements, funding and clinical privileges directly with the official institution.
Start with evidence. Continue with the source.
Compare opportunities, understand the known gaps and verify the details that matter directly with the institution.