← All guides
ORTHOFELLOW GUIDE · 4 MINUTE GUIDE

Hip and knee fellowship guide

Hip and knee is an anatomical description, not a complete curriculum. A fellowship may concentrate on joint replacement, revision surgery, joint preservation or sports knee reconstruction. First choose the training gap you want to close; then compare programmes whose published work matches it.

Educational guidance, not legal, immigration, licensing or admissions advice.
ORTHOFELLOW DATA SNAPSHOT

Hip and Knee pathways in the directory

This guide is informed by the current canonical OrthoFellow dataset, not a generic application template.

Canonical pathways
193
Countries and regional routes
28
Published funding support
57
Current application signals
141
Counts update with the directory. Counts cover the full directory category, including different programme formats and related curricula. They do not represent available places or individually eligible programmes.

Separate reconstruction, preservation and sports training

Create distinct groups for adult reconstruction, hip preservation and sports knee training. A programme can overlap several groups, but its title alone does not reveal the balance. For an arthroplasty goal, investigate primary and revision hip and knee exposure. For preservation, ask about the particular procedures and patient groups involved. For sports knee training, examine ligament, meniscal and cartilage experience rather than assuming it accompanies joint replacement.

Search both hip and knee and adult reconstruction

OrthoFellow keeps these specialty labels because providers use both. Search the worldwide hip and knee and adult reconstruction directories, then compare the underlying programme descriptions. In the USA, the AAHKS fellowship directory is a first-party source for adult reconstructive hip and knee programmes. In Australia, use the AOA directory to confirm the exact accredited listing. Recognition and accreditation terms should remain attached to the body that publishes them.

Translate departmental volume into fellow exposure

Ask how cases are shared among fellows, residents and other trainees, and what your role would be at each site. A large service may provide substantial exposure without assigning every case to one fellow. Request a typical weekly schedule and a description of progression. Distinguish observed procedures, assisted cases and supervised operating when comparing logs or alumni accounts.

  • Hip versus knee allocation
  • Primary versus revision cases
  • Preservation and sports components
  • Clinic, perioperative care and follow-up
  • Named supervisors and rotation sites

Treat technology as one part of the curriculum

If robotics, navigation or a particular surgical approach matters to you, ask which systems are used, how frequently the fellow participates and who supervises the training. Balance that exposure against planning, conventional techniques, complication assessment and follow-up. A technology name in an advertisement does not quantify experience or show that the skill will transfer to your future hospital.

Resolve practical eligibility before ranking programmes

Record your intended intake and the actual application route. Ask whether the host accepts your residency background and international status, then check registration, visa sponsorship and hospital credentialing separately. Compare salary or stipend with fees, registration costs and relocation. Keep missing funding unknown; do not assign a typical salary from another institution or an older contract year.

Use a training-gap comparison

Imagine that your current practice includes primary arthroplasty but limited revision exposure. A broad knee fellowship with attractive sports work may not address that gap as directly as a revision-focused programme. Conversely, an applicant seeking meniscal preservation should not choose on arthroplasty case volume alone. Write down what evidence supports the fit and what still needs confirmation; this comparison is more useful than a universal programme ranking.

EVIDENCE AND ACTIONS

Sources checked and applicant checklist

The curriculum comparison is an editorial question framework. AAHKS and AOA provide official programme-discovery context; the guide does not assign procedures, funding or privileges to a host without programme-specific evidence.

Before you act

  • Search both hip and knee and adult reconstruction labels.
  • Distinguish arthroplasty, preservation and sports training.
  • Request the per-fellow case mix and supervised role.
  • Confirm the current intake, application route and appointment terms.

Official sources

Sources reviewed 1 October 2026. Recheck the linked source because cycles and regulatory requirements can change.
COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently asked questions

Is a hip and knee fellowship the same as adult reconstruction?

Some programmes use the terms for substantially overlapping arthroplasty training. Hip and knee can also describe preservation or sports-focused work. Compare the published curriculum rather than treating every title as equivalent.

Do all hip and knee fellowships include robotics?

No universal exposure should be assumed. Ask which systems are used, what the fellow does and whether that experience is a defined part of the programme.

How do I find a current hip and knee deadline?

Check the programme profile and its official application source for the full date and intake year. A recurring annual programme or a society listing is not evidence of a currently open call.

Privacy policy

Your privacy choices

Essential storage keeps your shortlist, preferences and sign-in working.

Optional Google Analytics is not enabled on this site.

Advertising choices

Advertising consent settings appear here when Google’s consent message is available for this visit. Your analytics choice does not grant advertising consent.

Read the privacy policy